Masachusetts Shave Business Blog

People who took out bad mortgages or bought houses they couldn’t afford once interest rates reset shouldn’t be helped.  “I acted responsibly,” they said. “Why should someone who acted less responsibly than I did be rewarded by a better deal then I got?” Others say that the collective impact of these mortgages going into foreclosure and people filing bankruptcy have such a negative effect on the economy that something needs to be done to staunch the hemorrhaging.

The problem is that all of the solutions discussed thus far including bankruptcy filing seem to carry a high price tag. Buying the bad mortgages would cost hundreds of billions, as would giving government benefits directly to people with bad mortgages.

Also when it comes to mortgages, there are many people that have been scammed by a mortgage broker, promised one loan and given another. To the untrained eye, unless those flaws are obvious in the loan documents, the future holder of the loan is not liable for that claim. If proper assignments were not completed until just in time for court, the consumer may have plenty of rights to offset the claims made by the servicer. But consumers will never know the option is there if the lender can hide the chain of assignments behind smoke and mirrors. The Bankruptcy courts are federal courts. Federal courts are constitutionally limited to addressing only a case or controversy between parties who have a true stake, something to win or lose in the outcome. Someone claiming such a stake has to be able to prove it.